ENCLAVE IS CLOSING"
Here's how things will work over the next week or so: (subject to change)
Wednesday night will be SKALES. Cross and rain are presenting. Well worth the trip, they do a great presentation.
Next weekend will be the last parties. Both nights are play parties. Same rules as always. Same prices as always (15$ for members/$20 for guests) Same hours (8pm - 2am)
Sunday, the 9th, at noon, we'll be having a "going out of business" sale. Raffles, auctions and a kick asss BBQ courtesy of Blackwulf and MtDancer. Just about everything in the building can go. In addition to a few bucks to put towards the debtload, anything we sell I don't have to move and pay storage on. So, here's your chance to own a little piece of things. And it's not just the play equipment. There are some really nice couches, tables, artwork, chairs, etc in there. Easily nice enough for home use, if you needed furniture for your house. Some of the artwork is racy, but much of it is nice enough for home use.
For a gallery of auction items click here
Our address is: 6040 E 50th, Commerce City.
| Federal Appeals Court Sends Hearty Fuck You to FCC |
|
|
The ruling, handed down by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday, is not likely to make the Bush administration happy, given its thus far limited successes in the areas of obscenity prosecution and restriction. Martin, who has aggressively promoted the president’s policies by levying increasingly hefty fines for an increasingly broad category of alleged violations, says the agency has not yet decided whether or not to appeal the decision before all appeals court judges or have the issue resolved by the Supreme Court. Martin may well be smarting from the language and tone employed by court paperwork associated with the case, which primarily focused on “fleeting expletives” spoken unexpectedly and spontaneously, as has happened during profanity laced utterance from such luminaries as U2’s Bono, vice president Dick Cheney, and president George W. Bush. The court ultimately instructed the commission to rewrite its indecency policy, but warned that it was “doubtful” that the FCC would “adequately respond to the constitutional and statutory challenges raised by the networks.”
|
|||||||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|